Submit Applications
The Tailored Submission Workflow allows administrators to design application processes that align with the unique requirements of each award. This flexibility eliminates redundant steps, reduces applicant frustration, and ensures every award’s distinct criteria are met seamlessly.
Convenient Nomination
Convenient Nomination simplifies the process of nominating candidates, whether for internal employee awards, public grants, or scholarships.
Nominators can submit entries via email invitations, public links, or bulk CSV uploads, with options to anonymize nominee details for impartiality. Pre-filled templates guide nominators through required fields (e.g., justification statements, supporting evidence), while automated alerts notify nominees to complete their applications. This feature ensures high participation rates by minimizing friction for both nominators and nominees, whether nominations are open to the public or restricted to specific groups.
Automated AI Shortlist
The Automated AI Shortlist leverages machine learning to accelerate the initial screening of applications.
By analyzing historical data and predefined criteria (e.g., keywords, qualifications, or scoring rubrics), the AI ranks submissions, flags top candidates, and highlights inconsistencies or missing information. Administrators can refine results by adjusting weightings for fairness (e.g., prioritizing diversity metrics) or overriding AI suggestions. This feature reduces manual review time by up to 70%, ensures objectivity, and surfaces the strongest applicants for deeper human evaluation.
Custom Approval Process
With the Custom Approval Process, organizations can define multi-tiered approval chains to validate submissions, budgets, or award rules before applications go live.
For example, a grant program might require sign-off from legal, finance, and program leads at different stages. Admins can configure parallel or sequential approvals, set deadlines for reviewers, and track bottlenecks in real time. Audit logs capture comments, changes, and approvals for compliance reporting, ensuring accountability and alignment with organizational policies.
Efficient Judging Workflow
The Efficient Judging Workflow streamlines how judges evaluate submissions. Judges access a centralized portal to review anonymized entries, score candidates using custom rubrics, and leave feedback.
Features like side-by-side comparison tools, collaborative scoring, and AI-generated summaries of applicant strengths help judges make informed decisions faster. Real-time dashboards show consensus levels, scoring trends, and unresolved conflicts, while automated reminders keep deliberations on track. This end-to-end workflow ensures transparency, reduces administrative back-and-forth, and accelerates winner selection.
What’s Next?
A truly user-centric, well-designed and professional program with great functionality and performance benefits workers in different fields
